The Aqua satellite happened to capture a picture of the Lolo Complex fires at exactly the same moment they “blew up in perfect conditions,” according to the Missoulian. I had to stitch together the version above from the edges of this image, and I didn’t bother to do any spherical correction or anything, so you may notice a few weird artifacts. The 22-mile Canyon Ferry Lake in the lower right corner can be used for scale.
Zoo Town is Missoula, Montana, in case you were wondering. Missoula has grown an interesting set of craft breweries in the last decade. There are some fundamental differences between them and bars, despite both serving beer. Taprooms can serve a max of three drinks to a customer, can’t prepare and serve food on premise, and stop serving alcohol at 8 PM. This makes for a slightly different crowd, one less likely to feature an under-age college kid puking on your shoes or drunkenly side-swiping your truck in the parking lot with his Dodge Viper. The relaxed atmosphere can even encourage the odd parent or two to bring kids, who then get to observe adults drinking in a limited and responsible way.
So is there room for one more? Hell yeah! The current batch serve up some tasty brews, but their interior decors and atmospheres have a limited range, tending towards the rustic. And while Montana does have its share of cowboys, fly fishers, and drooling moose, it is connected to the rest of the world with interstate highways and the internet, not wagon roads and telegraphs. Montana taprooms and beers should not have to be themed solely after Old West iconography.
Taprooms also have a more serious issue – beer-drinkers like food. This has led to convoluted relationships where nearby pizza restaurants send cars over every 10 minutes or a mobile barbecue in the shape of a garlic bulb parks outside, and these relationships tend to be seasonal. That’s why I’m so excited about the Ice Bridge brewery being dreamed up by Meg Gorseth and her dad Mark. Not only is the Viking theme unique, but the current plans include a separate but co-located burger joint. Just get yourself a burger and fries from über-chef Crego and step next door into the brewery to settle down with your burger and a pint. These factors, plus the fact that Meg’s gender is under-represented in the brewing world, suggests to me that this enterprise will have a distinctly different vibe and draw a different and currently under-served demographic.
The Ice Bridge brewery has already received almost enough funding to get started, but Meg is running a crowdfunding campaign to put it over the top (one of the many unique twists she brings to the table). If this sounds like a bit of a pitch – it is. I happen to know the key players in this venture personally, and I’m excited to see it get off the ground. Consider donating – you could end up with some cool swag that will become collector’s items in years hence, and you’ll be helping make Missoula just a bit more awesome.
When searching for a host for this modest, experimental website, I found Go Daddy, and I got sucked in by a combination of cheap pricing and the promise that I’d be working with a leader in the industry. After having been with them for a year, I feel like I’m qualified to comment on the quality of service. One good thing is that even with the enormous security hole that my WordPress install on a Windows operating system made, and even though I shared the same virtual server with a bunch of other users, my account was never breached or compromised. Why would a hacker bother? Page load times as measured by Google were 6 or 7 seconds, although in my experience it could take 20 seconds or even time out and error. On Memorial Day I had Go Daddy switch my site from a Windows server to a Linux server. It took about an hour, and all I had to do afterward was to follow the instructions at the WordPress Support Blog. My site is definitely faster – 2 second load times – and the time-out errors have disappeared.
So it was not my ISP but the operating system slowing things down. Go Daddy serves up my pages relatively quickly. Is Go Daddy perfect? Well, there’s the non-stop spam. Not the spam to my website - hell, I’m happy to see comment spam — the spam from GoDaddy.com to the email inbox I used to sign up for the service with. And the almost-pornographic advertising campaign and the buggy, inscrutable site management interface. But if their support team continues to answer support questions and migrate blogs on national holidays, I’m sticking with Go Daddy.
I’ve also switched to a newer version of the free Swift Theme from Satish Gandham (congratulations on your marriage, Satish). The version number I was on 5.62, and I’ve upgraded to 0.2.2. I presume it’s actually 6.2.2. The new version doesn’t appear to have a built-in social media widget, so I added the AddThis plugin. Which I then discovered had a bug that where the widget box truncated a comment box, so I had to select the AddThis option that opens a popup window for the social gadget of your choice. I’m not found of popups, but it’ll do until I find something better.
Things have gotten pretty busy since the kid started going to preschool, and the website has suffered from neglect. It seems like the only thing I can make time for is the occasional meteor shower. And so here are the Geminids, in photos taken from the same mountain pass as the Perseids in my previous post. I like the Geminids. They are bright, slow-moving, yellow, and clumpy. Clumpy is not a technical word, it is my own description. I found that meteors in this particular shower were far more likely to occur in pairs, appearing virtually simultaneously and in the same area of the sky, than any other shower I’ve seen. That fact that I was able to capture two in the same 20 second exposure appearing near the same trees should attest to that. It is not lost on me that the radiant is in Gemini, the Twins.
The night sky is beautiful but generally isn’t dynamic. Other than the slow rolling of the entire sky as the night progresses (as if the stars were affixed to a sphere), there’s very little movement. Until you see the bright flash of a meteor. And a meteor shower can turn the sky into a show. The Perseid meteor shower may be easier to see than most. Its radiant is in the constellation Perseus, making it visible to most people in the northern hemisphere, where the majority of the Earth’s population resides anyways. It starts in mid July and peaks August 11th or 12th. August nights are longer than June or July nights, affording more time to view the shower, but are also warm enough to make lying or sitting still for long periods of time comfortable. The shower’s large footprint on the calendar makes it easy to coordinate viewing around a busy schedule.
And this year the Perseid viewing should be good. The peak nights happen to occur on a weekend when the Moon will be a waning crescent that only appears late – on the 12th it rises a few hours after midnight and won’t reach its highest point in the sky until well after the sun has risen. Unless you have to contend with forest fire smoke or clouds, it could be grand.
Is there a special technique to viewing a meteor shower? Here I will avoid insisting that you keep scientific records (time, apparent magnitude, constellation), and in fact will assume you are not particularly interested in photographing them (expensive SLR camera on a tripod). Make sure you have beverages and snacks. Warm clothing, blankets, or sleeping bags may not seem necessary on a summer night, but ideal viewing conditions are in areas with no clouds and low humidity, and thus radiational cooling and a cold night. Consider bringing a reclinable chair, cot, or air mattress. Seek the country – city lights are anathema to good viewing. Binoculars and telescopes are pointless unless there are other things you are planning on looking at. Don’t set overly-optimistic expectations: even at peak, one meteor a minute is the likely rate.
And now you’ll have to decide where to point your face. If a straight line is drawn through each meteor trail, all such lines will merge at a point called the radiant. Experts agree that looking directly at the radiant is not the best place to look. The closer a meteor starts to the radiant, the shorter its trail will appear to you, although paradoxically it means the meteor’s true path was pointed more directly at your head than others. But after discussing the radiant, opinions diverge. The advice at Spacedex is simply to “look approximately half way up the sky facing northeast…. Looking directly up at the sky or into the radiant is not recommended….” These people are wrong. Halfway up the sky in the northeast is where the radiant in Perseus will be, at least for the early night, so they’ve told you to look at the radiant and not to look at it in the same paragraph. Unfortunately the northeast is also the direction the moon will be rising in later, and you don’t want to ruin your night vision by looking at that.
Theoretically, to see the longest meteor trains, you should be looking 90 degrees away from the radiant. However, there are other factors to consider. Near to the horizon, the increased thickness of atmosphere leads to greater light scattering, decreasing the brightness of meteors there slightly but also increasing the amount of background light, thus leading to decreased contrast between meteor and sky and poorer viewing. Also , if you are looking towards the horizon, part of your field of view is of the ground, and meteors don’t appear there. Most of your field of view should be filled by sky. So just after sundown when Perseus is close to the horizon, you should be looking straight up. As Perseus rises in the northeast, you should consider looking slightly southwest and as the night progresses toward dawn look more to the west. If you get bored of the meteor show, consider looking at Perseus. Below him you will see the Moon and Jupiter, and later at night even Venus, all in the same area of sky.
I was at REI in Missoula, MT, one day and noticed several lights outside pointed downwards towards some tall grasses planted against the wall. Intrigued, I returned after dark to take some photos.
Notice the downward facing lights along the wall. The lamp in the parking lot is extremely bright, but faces downward. The interior is brilliantly lit, but an awning traps most of the upwardly directed light escaping from doors and windows. The illuminated sign is composed of small lettering and a moderately sized logo (unlike the large, garish, bloated, balloon lettering on the store next door). This store is not losing much light to the sky above, and as an astronomer, this makes me happy.
The night sky, for most viewers, has lost something. As cities get bigger, electrical supplies steadier, power cheaper, as lighting technology advances, as particulate matter spews into the air, the night sky has been smothered by the strange glow of light pollution. Because of its slow, steady progress, each generation is little aware that it has less than the generation before. The few dozen stars people can see are a mere shadow of the myriad stars, planets, meteors, aurorae, comets, moons, nebulae, and galaxies that are available to the lucky few whose skies are still dark. For more information on light pollution, including its detrimental affect on wildlife and human health and how to help combat it, visit the International Dark Sky Association.
A few last words. First, I am a member of REI but am not receiving financial compensation for this post. Secondly, yes, the sign shows up as a ghost image – inverted green lettering just below the roofline. This, like the lens flare from the light in the upper right corner, is a camera artifact.
Since I’ve already covered unicorns, UFOs, and time machines, I thought I’d throw a ghost in for good measure — a ghost featured in one of the most famous ghost photos of all time, to be precise. Provand and Shira’s photo of the Brown Lady on a staircase in Raynham Hall, Norfolk, England, appeared in Country Life magazine in December 1936. The faint, humanoid wisp has been called a ghost, a grease smear on the lens, a light-leak in the camera, and a double exposure.
I used this higher resolution image as my source. I filtered a Fourier Transform of three overlapping areas, then transformed them back, pasted them back together, and then overlayed the resulting enhanced ghost image over the original staircase to get this:
OceanExplorer.se has released a new sonar image containing both alleged UFOs. Since it is of higher resolution than those I used in my original post, and because this is the first time the second UFO image has been directly hosted by them , I am posting new enhanced images of both.
I promised I’d state my opinion on what these images represent…
Having posted about GlacierWork’s stunning photos documenting glacier declines in the Himalayas just a few months ago, I was caught off guard by a new paper that suggests the glaciers in the Karakoram range are getting bigger. The Karakorams are actually just the northwestern extension of the Himalayas, and GlacierWorks posted numerous photos documenting glacier decline there over the last century or so. For instance, look at the colorized version of this 1909 photo, originally black and white, by Vittorio Sella of Concordia, the junction of the Baltoro and Godwin-Austin glaciers:
It wouldn’t be a broken time machine without the weird color artifacts, like the fractal blue “lightning” in the upper right corner, due to differences in the positions of objects (especially clouds) in the current photo the colors came from:
It’s patently obvious that the glacial volume has decreased substantially in a century. The new paper by Julie Gardelle, Etienne Berthier, and Yves Arnaud in Nature Geoscience compared satellite data between 1999 and 2008 and reported a mass gain (technically, an increase in ice volume). Of note is how their last data was collected in 2008 and the most recent GlacierWorks photo is from 2009. Apparently, after a decade of weight gain, the glaciers are still looking thinner than they did a century ago. So while it is interesting that these glaciers are currently bucking the trend amongst sub-polar glaciers, it is far from certain that they can keep it up. I also think this demonstrates that scientists are completely willing to admit “global warming” is not a monolithic trend, and that regionally some odd things can happen. That’s why the preferred term is “climate change.”
The family had been in the car all day. We were returning from a funeral in Minnesota, where the weather had turned cold and cloudy to match everyone’s mood. We were now in South Dakota, heading West on I90. The horizon had been as gray as the rest of the sky, but it start to change slightly. It turned into a blue thread, then opened up into a yellow ribbon. The cloud layer did not envelope the Earth. It had an edge, and beyond it was the promise of clear sky. I stopped the car to photograph it.
The yellow color was a sign that the sun was low and about to set. The cornfield was not the most exciting scenery, and we were still hundreds of miles from home, so I got back in the car and continued driving. I knew that at some point we would either break free of the cloud or the sun would drop through the gap between cloud and ground. I was not disappointed… Continue reading →